Partner Steven W. Kraus obtained a defense verdict in Supreme Court, Nassau County, rejecting plaintiffs’ claims of urological negligence associated with the placement of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). The plaintiff claimed the necessity of three additional surgical procedures along with sexual dysfunction and ongoing urinary incontinence. The defense successfully argued that the patient received informed consent, that the procedure was indicated and appropriately performed and that the necessity of subsequent procedures was unrelated to the placement of the device by the defendant urologist.
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- July 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019